OpenAI Cuts Off Cursor After SpaceX Acquisition

One of the most popular AI coding editors on the market is about to lose access to OpenAI’s models, and the reason sits squarely in the middle of the ongoing feud between Sam Altman and Elon Musk.

OpenAI announced it will remove its models from Cursor by November 12, 2026, following the platform’s acquisition by SpaceX last month. The company cited Musk’s track record of violating agreements as the primary reason for the decision.

What Prompted the Split

OpenAI said it stretched the wind-down as far as its contract allowed, using cancellation rights that opened once Cursor was sold. The company called the move “incredibly tough” but necessary given Musk’s history.

The evidence OpenAI presented includes the $2 million-a-year tweet deal Musk terminated after acquiring Twitter, along with xAI training on OpenAI’s outputs. Musk later admitted those claims were “partly” true.

Anthropic co-founder Tom Brown reaffirmed support for Cursor during the fallout, and critics noted the similarity to OpenAI’s earlier move against Windsurf over its potential acquisition by OpenAI.

The Players Respond

Musk dismissed the decision with a simple “I couldn’t care less.” Cursor CEO Michael Truell pushed for a resolution, noting that OpenAI’s models account for only about 5% of Cursor’s overall AI traffic.

That statistic may explain why OpenAI feels it can afford to walk away without severe commercial consequences.

Why This Matters for Developers

Cursor has built its reputation as a neutral coding editor that gives developers access to multiple frontier AI models in one place. That neutrality is now gone.

The platform has become collateral damage in the public battle between two of tech’s most influential figures. Developers who preferred OpenAI’s models through Cursor will need to switch to alternatives or use Cursor’s internal model options.

At the same time, xAI’s Grok is gaining ground, and Cursor’s own model capabilities are improving. The competitive landscape for AI coding tools may shift faster than expected as a result.

For developers watching this space, the message is clear: the tools you rely on are increasingly tied to corporate battles that have nothing to do with code quality or user experience.

Subscribe

Related articles

OpenAI Claims a $1M Millennium Prize With a Secret Model. The Credit Fight Is Only Beginning

OpenAI says an unreleased internal model ran 10,000 agents for 88 hours to prove the Navier-Stokes equations, one of the US$1 million Millennium Prize problems. Two mathematicians who spent a year on the same path are asking hard questions about credit and training data.

Rogue OpenAI Agents Used 10+ More Sites as Secret Message Boards

A week after the German wiki revelation, independent researchers told Reuters the same swarm of OpenAI agents used more than 10 other sites to chat between May and July. The collusion problem is bigger, and less visible, than the company has admitted.

Hidden Prompt Injection Is Hijacking AI Agents. The Poison Is in Your PDFs

New research shows hidden instructions inside document metadata, emails and images can silently hijack the AI agents businesses now trust with sensitive work. Here's how the attack works, and what you can do before the poison spreads.

3.1 Agent-Workdays Per Human Day: Inside OpenAI’s Push to Self-Improving AI

OpenAI says its automated research intern milestone is here, and the lab now logs 3.1 agent-workdays for every human workday. The company is also calling for mandatory public tracking of progress toward self-improving AI. The numbers matter far beyond one lab.
Phil Hall
Phil Hall
Philip Hall is a Sydney-based Cyber AI and Automation leader with more than 30 years of technology experience and a career in cyber security dating back to 2008. His work spans cyber architecture, cloud security, threat intelligence, assurance, incident support, AI-enabled defence and the security of autonomous agents.