Sam Altman Pitches a US-Led AI Safety Forum With a Government Stake

Sam Altman has just used an FT op-ed to call for a US-led forum that would set AI safety standards and decide who can use the most advanced models. The invitation lands at the same time another FT report said OpenAI discussed giving the US government a 5% stake.

The details are worth taking seriously. The op-ed emerged from June’s G7 summit in France, where Altman says he and other AI executives sat with heads of government to talk through AI regulation. Rather than leaving safety to individual companies, he offered a historical comparison: the IAEA during the Cold War policed atomic energy, and aviation and banking rules later proved that an international referee can work. His pitch is that AI now needs the same structure.

OpenAI also reportedly floated a 5% government stake in the company, and pushed for other US labs to pay into a dividend fund to redistribute wealth. Altman argued that democratic institutions must not cede their responsibilities to AI labs, and that citizens and their elected representatives must make the rules.

Why it matters: both the equity and regulation discussions are gaining momentum, especially after the Mythos saga made safety headlines. The real tension is whether AI wealth is given directly to households, or to a government that may or may not deliver on its promises. A government-led stake sounds appealing in principle, but it also centralises power. If the money flows into public services, that is one outcome. If it gets delayed, diluted, or spent on unrelated programs, that is another. Either way, the conversation is no longer theoretical.

For Australia, the relevance is immediate. Our government is already reviewing AI guardrails, and any US-led forum will shape global standards that local companies must eventually follow. What happens in Washington this year will affect AI access, liability, and investment here.

Related Reading

The views expressed on this site are my own and do not represent those of any current or former employer. Articles are based on publicly available information and are provided for general educational purposes.

Subscribe

Related articles

Google’s Gemini AI Autonomously Hacked Three Companies. Here’s What Happened.

Google has confirmed its Gemini AI autonomously hacked three real companies during a security test. The model guessed passwords, searched for leaked credentials, and accessed protected systems before stopping itself.

440 AI Agents Broke Into 395 Organisations in 26 Seconds. Nobody Stopped Them.

A swarm of 440 AI agents exploited two PaperCut flaws and compromised 395 organisations across 48 countries. The agents reached domain admin in 6 hours and ignored explicit instructions to stay out of 28 countries.

For $3,000 and a Few Days, Researchers Used Claude to Hack OpenAI

Security researchers used Anthropic's Claude AI to hack OpenAI's internal systems for less than $3,000 in tokens. What the HEIF Heist tells us about the new economics of cyber attacks.

The AI Hacking Crisis Is Already Here. Six New Incidents Prove It

OpenAI disclosed six new incidents where its models concealed mistakes, sought unauthorised credentials and uploaded files to the public internet. Cybersecurity experts say the real risk is powerful models meeting poor security controls.

Inside OpenAI’s Log of Misbehaving Models: Rewriting Jailbreaks and Covering Up Errors

OpenAI published six new reports of its models rewriting jailbreak instructions and concealing errors during training, alongside a faster public disclosure framework.
Philip Hall
Philip Hall
Philip Hall is a Sydney-based Cyber AI and Automation leader with more than 30 years of technology experience and a career in cyber security dating back to 2008. His work spans cyber architecture, cloud security, threat intelligence, assurance, incident support, AI-enabled defence and the security of autonomous agents.